Why was it difficult to govern russsia?

Russia was a dictatorship. The ruler Of Russia was the Emperor ( tsar) and in principle everything that happened in Russia was his responsibility which he joint with no one and was responsible thoroughgoing(a)ly to God for his actions. From 1894 until 1917, Nicholas II was the Tsar and autocrat of in all the Russias and he had succeeded his father Alexander trio who had died plot til now relatively young (49 years old). Alexanders father, Alexander II, had try to correct Russia by creating local councils and freeing the serfs (slaves) exclusively his only give thanks from some sections of the Russian population was growing resentment. This concluded in his brutal murder. Neither Alexander III nor Nicholas II were implicated in reform and indeed they attempt to restore the mediaeval idea of the Tsar and his people. Nicholas was dominated by his father both(prenominal) physically and mentally and throughout his career as Tsar he tried to follow the policies that his f ather had been so earnest about. Nicholas dismissed any ideas of further reforms as complete ignorance. He literally tried to rule Russia on his birth and tried to reply to every letter personally nevertheless the upright volume was overly much. Also its doubtful if Nicholas had the intellect to be a successful autocrat whereas he would view do a very good constitutional sovereign relying on elected Prime Ministers for advice and confining himself to consultation and word quite an than executive action. His cousin King George V of Britain turn out to be very successful in this role. Russia was too openhanded and too modern a country to be rule by one man and to assist him the Tsar had the Russian urbane service, some of whom were very able and clever but as well as many were corrupt, poorly ameliorate and unwilling to take any... If you compliments to get a panoptic essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If! you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay